Feed aggregator
Linux Foundation Research Finds Open Source Is Key To Driving India's AI Market - PR Newswire
Linux Foundation Research Finds Open Source Is Key To Driving India's AI Market - PR Newswire
Linux Foundation Research Finds Open Source Is Key To Driving India's AI Market - PR Newswire
Linux Foundation Research Finds Open Source Is Key To Driving India's AI Market - PR Newswire
Linux Foundation Research Finds Open Source Is Key To Driving India's AI Market - PR Newswire
Rocket League devs promise not to break Linux support or ban modders when Easy Anti-Cheat gets added - PC Guide
Take the reins this Year of the Horse.Take the reins this Year of the Horse.Keyword Contributor
EU Parliament Blocks AI Features Over Cyber, Privacy Fears
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
KDE Plasma 6.6 Desktop Environment Officially Released, This Is What’s New - 9to5Linux
AsteroidOS 2.0 Launches: A Community-Driven Linux Revival for Smartwatches - Linux Journal
LockBit Ransomware Unleashes Devastating 5.0 Version Targeting Windows, Linux, and ESXi - Cyber Press
MMB Ultimate Interest Rate Chaser Calculator (Fixed/Updated 2026)
😎 First made 20 years ago, last updated in 2026! Zero AI used! 😜
Thinking about moving your cash to a different bank account with a higher interest rate? Each month, I research the high interest rates available on cash. Big banks and corporates earn billions of dollars on your idle cash when it earns you nothing.
For example, you might have $10,000 in a savings account earning 3.00% APY and you want to know if it’s worth moving to one earning 4.00% APY. Use this handy calculator to find out how much more money you could earn by switching, which you then can weigh against the time and effort required.
My Money Blog Ultimate Rate Chaser Calculator
in 1 month you’ll have earned an extra (estimated): After 6 months, you’ll have earned an extra (estimated):
Notes
- This calculator is based on a rate-chasing breakeven time formula developed here a long, long, long time ago (2006!) which takes into account the “days of lost interest”, or the time in between transfers where the money is not earning interest in either account.
- The formula actually uses APR, not APY. APY takes into account compounding frequency. The overwhelming majority of online savings accounts compound interest daily. I also made a APY to APR calculator. Nowadays, I just assume daily compounding so that you can just input the APY instead of having to convert. A small minority of savings accounts do compound monthly, but most of those are the megabanks paying you 0.01% APY anyway.
- Usually, there can be between 0-3 days of lost interest when going from one bank to another. This depends on the policies of either bank and also which bank initiates the transfer. (It also may depend on if you straddle a weekend with the money earning no interest.) This value can significantly affect the break-even time when the difference is small.
- The 6-month value (182 days) isn’t simply 6 times the 1-month value (30 days), as the calculator takes into account the time needed first to “break-even”.
- Another factor to consider is how likely the current rate difference will persist. Interest rates on savings accounts can change at any time, whereas certificates offer a fixed rate over the guaranteed period.
Last updated 2/16/26.
Secondhand Laptop Market Goes 'Mainstream' Amid Memory Crunch
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
REMnux v8 brings AI integration to the Linux malware analysis toolkit - Help Net Security
The Music Industry Enters Its Less-Is-More Era
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Gentoo Linux Begins Codeberg Migration In Moving Away From GitHub, Avoiding Copilot - Phoronix
Your children subsidize your ambition
Levittown, NY, a post-WWII suburban single-family sprawl
Gen Z is conservative. Not culturally, but in how they respond to collapse. They grew up inside system collapse—financial crisis, institutional failure, pandemic, climate instability—and they’re responding the way post-crisis generations always do: by seeking constraint.
The Gen Z choices that confound us most are those that decrease opportunity: living with parents longer, delaying or rejecting children, choosing stable jobs over ambitious ones, preferring workplace protections over flexibility.
These aren’t signs of disengagement. They’re preparation for a correction that’s already underway.
Post-crisis generations don’t rebel, they stabilize
When large systems break, the next generation doesn’t tear them down. They stabilize them by making certain failures costly.
People who lived through the Great Depression and World War II built suburbs full of predictable single-family homes—stability at any price. But when isolated families led to spiking divorce rates, society didn’t ban divorce. It made abandonment expensive: child support, alimony, wage garnishment. You can leave, but you can’t externalize the damage.
We’re approaching the same moment with children.
Care is cheap because children pay the bill
Care looks cheap right now because children absorb the cost. Inconsistent parental presence means rotating caregivers, which harms development. But children have no enforceable rights, so the system treats this damage as free.
This isn’t a moral failure. It’s a price-signal failure. The market thinks care is cheap because no one is billing for the damage.
Here’s what that looks like in practice:
Molly Jong-Fast reports: “My mother was a famous feminist writer known for her candor and wit who couldn’t be bothered to spend time raising me.”
Her mother, Erica Jong, would likely agree. In an op-ed she wrote: “My travel schedule could not have been more divergent from my daughter’s schedule, so I hired nannies.” Then she showed a photo of herself cuddling her dog while her daughter leaned into the frame.
Jong writes about her parenting with impunity because children have no enforceable rights. The system treats the damage as free.
Children’s rights are coming
We can’t make parents more virtuous. But we can give children enforceable rights: consistent caregiving, adult presence, and relational continuity. The basics they need to develop without absorbing adult chaos.
Those rights will expose that jobs demanding total availability are incompatible with children. Someone other than children has to pay the cost.
Enforcement won’t target families. It will target employers. The same way payroll systems enforce child support, work structures will have to comply with care minimums. Jobs that require total availability will have to redesign roles, pay for compliant care, or accept that some positions can’t be paired with caregiving.
This is the same logic that governed divorce: don’t ban it, make abandonment costly. Applied to careers: you can have a demanding job, but you can’t externalize the cost onto children.
The TIME 100 proves care disqualifies you
In the list of TIME 100 Most Influential Women, almost none of them have children. Movie stars are the partial exception—they can buy continuity of care. But writers, activists, executives, academics? Overwhelmingly childless.
That’s selection pressure. The idea of productivity came from factories where the assumption was that time is infinitely extractable. Right now, influence is defined the same way: sustained, uninterrupted availability. Care disqualifies you by definition.
The system has already decided that care and power are incompatible. We’ve just been pretending otherwise.
Gen Z is planning for constrained time
Once children’s rights make time genuinely constrained—not just “hard to balance” but legally protected—fewer people will be able to have children. Declining fertility is capacity planning. Gen Z can feel that care is about to become structurally expensive, so they’re refusing to organize their lives around a system that only works by letting children absorb the failure.
Once children’s rights force the cost into the open, the outcomes are predictable because everything reorganizes around constraint rather than aspiration. Rather than asking How can I have it all? we ask What arrangement actually works?
Fewer children are better supported. Stable jobs overtake greedy jobs because they’re more compatible with care. Influence detaches from sheer availability. Living with parents becomes coordinated care capacity. Grandparents realize if they want grandkids they have to show up.
We are failing children today because we price them at zero. The people still chasing influence through uninterrupted availability are optimizing for a world that’s already gone. Gen Z isn’t giving up. They’re reading the future correctly.
The post Your children subsidize your ambition appeared first on Penelope Trunk Careers Blog.
Samsung Ad Confirms Rumors of a Useful S26 'Privacy Display'
Read more of this story at Slashdot.